[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package kget



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kget
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #309179 (http://bugs.debian.org/309179)
> # Bug title: kget: - unable to specify bandwidth limits
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 309179 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> # remote status report for #309179 (http://bugs.debian.org/309179)
> # Bug title: kget: - unable to specify bandwidth limits
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 309179 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> # remote status report for #428656 (http://bugs.debian.org/428656)
> # Bug title: kget: Drag and drop url to icon
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110784
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX
> usertags 428656 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX.
> # remote status report for #647207 (http://bugs.debian.org/647207)
> # Bug title: kget ignores bandwidth limits
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210694
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 647207 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
647207: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: