Hello, Jess,
Jessica Clarke wrote:
> I suspect you're falling afoul of the fact that, although I made the orig
> tarball reproducible [...]
Actually, in this case, I did change the contents of the tarball. I
believe I should have changed the source version as well. I think
convention is to add something like +ds1 or +repack1.
Since I had a little bit of free time this week I have this roadmap:
* Update kfreebsd-10 package to gcc-9 (done).
* Add version 10.3 man pages into kfreebsd-source-10.3.
* Build man pages related to kernel headers from
src:kfreebsd-kernel-headers instead of src:freebsd-manpages;
that way the man pages are in sync with the actual version of the
headers, but mainly: if k-k-h builds some arch-indep package, then
k-k-h could go back into sid, so that bootstrapping becomes possible
again. (Then maybe Helmut could keep it on jenkins.d.n).
* Similarly, get freebsd-utils back into sid.
* Update the debian/copyright file for kfreebsd-10, then kfreebsd-11.
* Get kfreebsd-11 through the NEW queue *maybe*
Although I'm only really focusing on kfreebsd-10 at first, to get kbsd
bootstrappable and debootstrappable *at all* with the least effort. The
switch to a newer kernel is way bigger project than I probably have time
for. But maybe then someone else feels like doing it!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature