[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 00:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I'm sorry Samuel, I asked both you and James Clarke, Cc:ed, for help on this
> > issue and you both said it was not possible to NMU cmake, even if you are
> > both
> > DD's.
> For my part, I was not talking about that patch, but about the
> hurd-related patches.
> For others, I can simply quote what was said:
> Felix Geyer wrote:
> > I suggest that instead you respond to questions on bugs you opened.
> > I'm not interested in maintaining patches for things that clearly
> > belong upstream.  Once upstream has reviewed the changes I'm happy to
> > cherry-pick them.

This is a comment on the Hurd bug, #900200, not the kfreebsd one, #905138.
And I did not open that bug, you did!

> And I agree with it (and also one of the reasons why I didn't just
> NMU-ed cmake with the hurd patch).

So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!

Reply to: