Re: Bug#878878: default-dbus-session-bus: Not installable on non-Linux
- To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 878878@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: James Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org>, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, GNU Hurd Maintainers <debian-hurd@lists.debian.org>, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#878878: default-dbus-session-bus: Not installable on non-Linux
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:39:54 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20171017213954.ccfzf5tvysenypqy@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
- Mail-followup-to: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 878878@bugs.debian.org, James Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org>, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, GNU Hurd Maintainers <debian-hurd@lists.debian.org>, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20171017152106.sh3bfw6qamdpjm6c@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- References: <20171017124131.GA96043@Jamess-MacBook.local> <[🔎] 20171017141211.54xhnunxel2ihor5@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] E83BE609-B242-463A-AE85-EC76CE98292E@debian.org> <20171017124131.GA96043@Jamess-MacBook.local> <[🔎] 20171017152106.sh3bfw6qamdpjm6c@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Hello,
It seems I missed the whole thread, so found the same issue
independently :)
Simon McVittie, on mar. 17 oct. 2017 16:21:06 +0100, wrote:
> Thanks. Hmm, so the error is:
>
> sbuild-build-depends-opencv-dummy : Depends: libgtk-3-dev but it is not going to be installed
>
> which is amazingly helpful.
Adding -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes provides the useful
information:
Investigating (0) dconf-service:hurd-i386 < none -> 0.26.1-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken dconf-service:hurd-i386 Depends on default-dbus-session-bus:hurd-i386 < none @un H >
Considering dbus-user-session:hurd-i386 0 as a solution to dconf-service:hurd-i386 7
Holding Back dconf-service:hurd-i386 rather than change default-dbus-session-bus:hurd-i386
...
> The dependency chain:
>
> libgtk-3-dev Depends dconf-gsettings-backend | gsettings-backend
> dconf-gsettings-backend Depends dconf-service
> dconf-service Depends d-d-s-b | d-s-b
>
> so we already have two layers of "if you accepted the alternative you'd
> be fine". I thought sbuild's allergy to alternatives only extended as
> far as direct dependencies?
That wouldn't be acceptable anyway, for the same reason as the direct
dependencies.
Samuel
Reply to: