Hello, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Thanks for this patch. Is this needed before stretch releases? (IIUC, > kfreebsd and hurd are not release architectures?) Indeed, this isn't relevant to stretch, this is not urgent. > I agree with this reasoning, but I'd rather have the libbsd support in > an upstream Unbound release rather than in the Debian package. I'll see > about producing a patch suitable for upstream. Yes, the configure.ac part is something we should propose to upstream: libbsd exists in other distros and, samba uses it for example. Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature