Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.

To: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
Cc: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:32:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 871thstwo7.fsf@anonymous.siccegge.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150603190313.GA91997@pyro.eu.org> (sfid-20150603_210334_832656_F1CA8696) (Steven Chamberlain's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:03:13 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20150603082829.GA1994@fatal.se> <[🔎] 20150603190313.GA91997@pyro.eu.org>

Hi!

Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> writes:
> As it seems `eject` isn't a POSIX-defined utility, shall we just let
> Linux provide its own version in util-linux, and kFreeBSD provide a
> simple camcontrol wrapper within freebsd-utils?  (and correspondingly
> in util-linux-udeb and freebsd-utils-udeb too)

Providing our wrapper sounds like the sane way forward to me.

Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
  - From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>

References:
- util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
  - From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
- Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
  - From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
Next by Date: Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
Previous by thread: Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
Next by thread: Re: util-linux taking over eject, kfreebsd concerns.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread