Re: possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite
Christoph Egger <email@example.com> writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Christoph Egger <email@example.com> writes:
>>> I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie
>>> release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I
>>> think would be best from our point of view and you tell me if I'm crazy
>>> or not:
>>> + There would be a jessie-kfreebsd thing next to the "normal" jessie
>>> with kfreebsd folks responsible for
>>> + Ideally that jessie-kfreebsd thing would exist as soon as possible so
>>> we can do our release preparations there
>> I think we can setup a jessie-kfreebsd suite. I guess it should
>> - just accept uploads (provided versions are greater-equal testing)
> Sounds OK to me. "just accept uploads" means uploads from any DD/DM or
> some list of keys? I guess it's easy to get the ACCEPTED mail for all
> uploads to that suite to a mailinglist?
Yes and yes.
> Moritz Mühlenhoff <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Sorry for the late reply. I'm afraid noone in the security team is
>> sufficiently familiar with the wanna-build setup, but I if implementable
>> by w-b I think it would be good to have the kfreebsd builds being triggered
>> once they are released through security.debian.org (we can probably hook
>> that into the "dak security-install" command or something similar). The
>> kfreebsd buildds are fast and should be able to build everything in acceptable
> Right. For the wb side I do have some (limited) insight. Who would need
> to hook that into security-install?
Hmm, does the security team plan to support kfreebsd? That is should
there also be a jessie-kfreebsd/updates suite on security.d.o?
I imagine we would want to automatically copy source+all packages from
jessie/updates to jessie-kfreebsd/updates in that case. Probably needs
some additional code in dak, but some of that I think I want to have