On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Perhaps kfreebsd-image-10 needs to 'Provide' a newer kfreebsd-image-9 > version (and adjust the Breaks to << that version), or something ugly > like that? That seems like it would make since. That's how normal package transitions are done (provide the transitional package for a cycle), so I don't even think it's that ugly. Best wishes, Mike