Re: issues affecting kfreebsd d-i
- To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: issues affecting kfreebsd d-i
- From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:49:53 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 53189921.8000400@pyro.eu.org>
- In-reply-to: <5308C0A2.4040901@debian.org>
- References: <52F01DCC.8030808@debian.org> <52F02298.1040306@pyro.eu.org> <20140203231704.GC5386@mraw.org> <52F030D5.4070906@pyro.eu.org> <52F0359C.1040809@debian.org> <52F0371A.3090000@pyro.eu.org> <52F0B731.7080006@debian.org> <52F0E1F9.7020300@pyro.eu.org> <5308C0A2.4040901@debian.org>
On 22/02/14 15:22, Robert Millan wrote:
> How about moving /usr and /var to tmpfs then? See attachment.
This is not quite ideal; if you copy /usr and /var from the initrd to
dynamically-sized ramdisks, you end up with two copies of the initial
contents in memory. That slightly raises the minimum overall memory
requirements, and kfreebsd-i386 systems are often constrained.
If we can get more numbers for disk space before/during/after install,
there be certain subdirectories where a ramdisk is more effective than
for all of /usr and /var.
Or if we can remove some useless udebs this may not be necessary yet.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Reply to: