Re: kfreebsd-8
- To: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
- Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: kfreebsd-8
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 17:09:07 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 522374B3.3070207@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <522114E6.3060703@pyro.eu.org>
- References: <5216743A.80602@debian.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308231111560.22959@contest.felk.cvut.cz> <5217529D.3000502@debian.org> <521F458D.2020501@debian.org> <522114E6.3060703@pyro.eu.org>
Steven Chamberlain:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/08/13 13:58, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Again, if I don't hear anyone against this, I'll go ahead and:
>>
>> - Upload kfreebsd-10 (with abiname=0) to sid.
>> - Make D-I a kfreebsd-9 / kfreebsd-10 dual boot.
>> - Request removal of kfreebsd-8.
>
> BTW I'm okay with removal of kfreebsd-8, I was just unsure when that
> should happen. I'm also unsure if kfreebsd-10 should go into sid yet.
> Whatever you and others think is best.
Okay, so let's just remove kfreebsd-8 for now, and make D-I kfreebsd-9 only?
--
Robert Millan
Reply to: