On 25/11/2013 16:14, Robert Millan wrote: > On 25/11/2013 14:56, Petr Salinger wrote: >> We still could preserve "struct session" size. > > That would break the expectation that MAXLOGNAME <= sizeof(s_login). Are > you sure it's a good idea? On second thought, this is getting too ugly and annoying. Maybe we should just bump it like FreeBSD did? What do you think about my patch? -- Robert Millan