> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:27:54PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: [...] >> I wouldn't be so sure that libgphoto2 is the one which needs to be fixed. In >> my opinion, here libmtp-dev does the wrong thing. I prepared the last NMU for libgphoto2 because we ran into a similar issue with sane-backends back then. I agree that libmtp-dev needs to be fixed too. However I also think that the dependency on libusbx/libusb2 can be dropped completely from libgphot2-2-dev because the reason for that, described in #407108, no longer holds true. See also http://bugs.debian.org/717914, that libgphoto2-2-dev should not depend on libusb-1.0-0-dev anymore. Regards, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature