Re: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

To: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:20:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8738mxluvf.fsf@anonymous.siccegge.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1Vh2RS-0000ds-9P@franck.debian.org> (sfid-20131114_203620_755088_816D2760) (Debian FTP Masters's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:19:02 +0000")
References: <[🔎] E1Vh2RS-0000ds-9P@franck.debian.org>

Moin!

Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> writes:
>    * Re-add libbsd_nlist.diff. It is still required when using kvm.h in
>      an external package.  (Closes: #729536)

Do we know if anything apart from nodejs is affected so I can have the
packages retried?

  Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>

References:
- freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

Prev by Date: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Re: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Previous by thread: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Re: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread