On 24.07.2013 12:51, Petr Salinger wrote: >>>> Please just fix ENODATA occurence, with updated libusb2-dev >>>> it suffices to build libgphoto2. >>> >>> Hmm, Steven claimed it would work with just the patched libusb.h. >> >> Sorry if I said/implied that; but I had applied Markus' ENODATA fix >> before testing for the other issue. So yes, both libusb2-dev and >> libphoto2 need fixes (in that order). > > Exact order of fixing is not necessary. > It is possible give-back libgphoto2 when fixed libusb2-dev > will be in unstable. > > The ENODATA occurence have to be fixed. Steven, Petr, first of all many thanks for your quick response and your patches! Right now I could successfully build libgphoto2 on kfreebsd-i386 with the ENODATA and libusb.h patch. I will forward the former upstream. Although I do agree with Petr that requesting a give-back would be an easy solution, I'm more concerned about the other libgphoto2 and sane-backends packages on non-kfreebsd architectures which can't migrate to testing at the moment. Do we have other options except waiting for a new release of libusb2-dev and removing the outdated kfreebsd packages from testing to make libgphoto2 and sane-backends swiftly migrate to testing? Regards, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature