Re: freebsd-libs_9.0+ds2-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes is NEW
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 21:22:13 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:libelf-freebsd-1 is NEW.
At least this one is a really bad idea, because even if it doesn't
cause a file system conflict with the other libelf implementations
they are a namespace conflict, due to using the exact same SONAME.
This will cause unexpected loading of the wrong shared library when
both libelf-freebsd-1 and libelf1 are installed at the same time.
Also it will not allow for libelf-freebsd-1 to be moved to the
multiarch paths, because that's what is currently preventing the file
system conflict. Is this API incompatible with either of the other
libelf implementations (libelf-dev, libelfg0-dev)? And if yes, would
porting the code be much work?
> binary:libdwarf3 is NEW.
> binary:libdwarf3-dev is NEW.
These are a namespace grab from the existing libdward-dev package.
Thanks,
Guillem
Reply to: