Re: FreeBSD 9.1 (was: Clang)
2013/6/23 Steven Chamberlain <email@example.com>:
> On 23/06/13 14:07, Robert Millan wrote:
>> However if we do this, I would not mix Clang transition with 9.1
>> upgrade. Having two separate transitions makes it easier to isolate
>> problems if/when they occur.
> Good point, but gcc-4.6 to gcc-4.8 would be a transition already? So
> would you initially use gcc-4.6? The result should probably not be
> allowed to migrate to jessie.
Are we going to transition to clang-3.2 or not?
If we are, I don't see the point in going to gcc-4.8 first.
Does anyone object to using clang-3.2 for kfreebsd-9?