Re: Clang
Hi.
OTOH I notice Petr's changes in kfreebsd-10 which enable use of GCC
4.8. However they haven't been uploaded yet.
Only DD can.
I recall there were major problems in the past that were triggered by
using a specific version of GCC in combination with optimization >=
-O2.
Petr, are you confident with using GCC 4.8 and reenable optimization?
The set as is in SVN does boot/work
on both real and kvm-based kfreebsd-amd64.
Are there any drawbacks to following upstream into using Clang for
kfreebsd-10? I always thought this would be the least painful path
when the day comes.
What about upload kfreebsd-10/gcc now ?
It would be nice to get more testing with gcc,
it can be handy later for STABLE-9 snapshot.
And switch to clang after that.
I will not work on bringing STABLE-9 snapshot,
I picked up different task, as you can see from SVN commits ;-)
Petr
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clang
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
- References:
- Clang
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>