[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683562: kfreebsd-image-9.0-1-amd64: Package does not install !

Questions and answers in the mail !

Le 30/08/2012 21:57, Steven Chamberlain a écrit :
On 30/08/12 20:32, Chlon Michaël wrote:
[...]

Paramétrage de kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64 (9.0-5) ...
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms 9.0-2-amd64
/boot/kfreebsd-9.0-2-amd64.gz
Error! Your kernel headers for kernel 9.0-2-amd64 cannot be found.
Please install the linux-headers-9.0-2-amd64 package,

[...]

Generating grub.cfg ...

[...]

Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-2-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.0.0-1-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-2-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-2-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Found iPXE image: /boot/ipxe.lkrn

[...]

error: superfluous RAID member (2 found).
done
Paramétrage de kfreebsd-image-9-amd64 (9.0-5) ...

== 8< =======================================================

The kfreebsd kernel is not here !  like before ...

I would say that is successful then?  Even if there are a lot of errors
and warnings, GRUB2 still generated a valid configuration for Linux and
the package install was successful.

If you were expecting a kfreebsd menu entry to be created in GRUB2, that
is not really meant to happen.
Yes !

You could manually create a menu entry for it, but all it could do is
boot the kernel, and then immediately panic/halt because it needs a
fully installed GNU/kFreeBSD root filesystem to go any further.
Why is there a package, if we can't use it with a debian installation ?


The earlier issue affecting GRUB ("v1") is more serious;  we must not
break someone's bootloader if they install the kfreebsd-image package on
GNU/Linux.

Thanks for testing!

Regards,


Reply to: