Re: RFC: seemingly gratuitous changes introduced by kkh 9.0-1

[Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>]

2012/5/6 Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz>:
> I does not look like there is a real problem.
>
> The gcc definitely uses internally some hashes, which under even slightly
> different source files would be different. The simple inclussion of
> additional definition at least changes line numbers in preprocessed source
> and sequence number of a defined type.

It's a relief to hear this.  Just to be sure, I'll prepare a pair of
builds and make a call for testers before uploading it to unstable.

Thanks!

-- 
Robert Millan