Re: UFS performance oddities
On 07/09/12 20:59, Weaver wrote:
>> Plain UFS could be expected to be slow. Because it is unjournalled, I
>> think metadata updates are forced to be synchronous.
> I have PC-BSD mounted on UFS on an old Compaq nx6120 laptop and it is
> anything other than slow
That figures, if PC-BSD has softupdates enabled but GNU/kFreeBSD doesn't?
Quote PC-BSD 1.0 Changelog: 'Partitions now have "Softupdates" enabled'