[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [FTBFS] PolyORB debug under kfreebsd



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 07/06/2012 22:11, xavier grave a écrit :
> Le 07/06/2012 21:14, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov a écrit :
>> Hi,
> 
>> This looks like the first part of bug
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642128
>> It was closed, but maybe re-appeared again?
> 
> dpkg -l gnat-4.6 gives :
> ii  gnat-4.6       4.6.3-4        GNU Ada compiler
> for a kfreebsd-amd64
> The build on kfreebsd-i386 doesn't reach this part (I have a
> segmentation violation in a call to idlac_wrapper before the
> compilation), I'll try to reproduce it by a direct compilation of po_catref
> 
> I'll also try to look at 642128 to investigate further. Thanks for
> pointing it to me.

I finally get time to investigate further : it looks like bug #642128.
But now this is the -Wl,-as-needed option that causes the error message.
If I compile without this flag, no more missing symbols. I didn't find
any bug related to this option in binutils. So I will open a new one
tomorrow as soon as I produce a minimal test case.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=y+GA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: