[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kfreebsd-i386 qualification for Wheezy

2012/5/16 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> On 16.05.2012 13:38, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> The table seems to be missing portbox: io
> aiui, io's still down to all intents and purposes; if that's correct then it
> doesn't really qualify as a porterbox right now.

Does asdfasdf have i386 chroots?  If not, is it feasible to add them?
Would then asdfasdf qualify as porter box for kfreebsd-i386?

Robert Millan

Reply to: