[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#671044: freedink: FTBFS[!linux]: too many args to install-reloc



Hi,

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:49:33AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> I'm applying this patch. Please let me know if this fixes the Freedink
> builds on GNU/kFreeBSD or not.
> 
> 
> 2012-05-01  Bruno Haible  <bruno@clisp.org>
> 
> 	relocatable-prog: Enable ELF ORIGIN trick also on GNU/kFreeBSD.
> 	* m4/relocatable.m4 (gl_RELOCATABLE_BODY): Treat kFreeBSD like Linux.
> 	* build-aux/reloc-ldflags: Likewise.
> 	Suggested by Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>.
> 
> --- build-aux/reloc-ldflags.orig	Wed May  2 02:43:45 2012
> +++ build-aux/reloc-ldflags	Wed May  2 02:41:45 2012
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
>  esac
>  
>  case "$host_os" in
> -  linux*) # Supported since Linux 2.1 and glibc 2.1.
> +  linux* | kfreebsd*)
>      rpath=
>      save_IFS="$IFS"; IFS=":"
>      for dir in $library_path_value; do
> --- m4/relocatable.m4.orig	Wed May  2 02:43:45 2012
> +++ m4/relocatable.m4	Wed May  2 02:42:57 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -# relocatable.m4 serial 17
> +# relocatable.m4 serial 18
>  dnl Copyright (C) 2003, 2005-2007, 2009-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
>  dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>      AC_CHECK_FUNCS([_NSGetExecutablePath])
>      case "$host_os" in
>        mingw*) is_noop=yes ;;
> -      linux*) use_elf_origin_trick=yes ;;
> +      linux* | kfreebsd*) use_elf_origin_trick=yes ;;
>      esac
>      if test $is_noop = yes; then
>        RELOCATABLE_LDFLAGS=:

The fix seems to have the expected result (install-reloc not invoked) under kFreeBSD:

  make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire « /usr/src/freedink-1.08.20120427/src »
  test -z "/usr/games" || /bin/mkdir -p "/usr/src/freedink-1.08.20120427/debian/freedink-engine/usr/games"
    /usr/bin/install -c freedink freedinkedit '/usr/src/freedink-1.08.20120427/debian/freedink-engine/usr/games'

Though, I'm wondering if it would be better to always invoke
install-reloc somehow.  We'd probably have spotted this issue earlier
if install-reloc were invoked under GNU/Linux as well.  WDYT?

-- 
Sylvain


Reply to: