On Jul 21, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> wrote: > >> A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted, > >> would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed > >> to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init > >> configuration, in the way they consider appropriate and without causing > >> a significant burden on the other ports? > >> I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this > >> would help concluding this debate. > > Does anybody have anything to say about this? > I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I > think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your > goal as an accepted premise. It still looks like an interesting question to me, and attributing second motives to it is just bad rethoric. But the lack of answers looks quite like a "no". -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature