Hi, Alle sabato 16 luglio 2011, Robert Millan ha scritto: > 2011/7/16 Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>: > > The debian/control file in %package% uses a negated list of > > architectures to specify a package relationship (most likely > > Build-Depends) on a Linux-specific package. I.e. something like: > > > > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 > > !hurd-i386] Nice initiative! > > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: kfreebsd I'd use some different usertag for this, as it is IMHO not that specific to kbsd (even if it will matter for you soon, it seems); this way this "migration" (and any other usage of wildcard archs, like for migrating "list of linux archs" -> "linux-any", "kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386" -> "kfreebsd-any", etc) could be generically tracked without getting also the kfreebsd bugs. What about a generic: User: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Usertags: wildcard-archs ? A couple of notes for packages in your list: - google-gadgets, qtmobility they have been fixed already in their git packaging repository, so their next upload will make use of wildcard archs - kradio4 I can do a QA upload for it -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.