On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] I think in the worst case we can just keep the current (as in non-point release version) of d-i on kfreebsd-* for the next point release and don't update to the binNMU. It's actually from the same source, so there are no issues with introducing out-of-dates. It's not that we'd need any urgent fixes in d-i on kfreebsd. That said, this needs to be fixed, and we're all not very happy, given the fact that we actually did ask before if something changes in the udeb output. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature