Re: Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
Is it possible to have 301 redirects from the missing pages to the correct one ?
That addition would make the intended sharing obvious.
2011/2/7, Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> David Prévot, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 23:50:26 -0400, a écrit :
>> Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> > Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit :
>> >> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> >>> Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +0000, a écrit :
>> >>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> 404.
>> >>> Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/
>> >>> for
>> >>> both.
>> >>> Where did you see that bogus URL?
>> >> http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/
>> >> We link according to the arch name.
>> > Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch
>> > name from port website name.
>> Hi kFreeBSD team,
>> We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve
>> their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more
>> consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64,
>> arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.)
>> but this choice is up to you.
>> If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and
>> ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated
>> links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to
>> ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated
>> in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also
>> need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and
> The installation guide already correctly generates the links.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Envoyé avec mon mobile