[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#569628: marked as done (kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Missing include in net80211/_ieee80211.h)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:06:43 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.62.1008031403150.32117@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
and subject line done: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Missing include in net80211/_ieee80211.h
has caused the Debian Bug report #569628,
regarding kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Missing include in net80211/_ieee80211.h
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
569628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Version: 0.47
Severity: important

Hi,

it looks to me like there's an include missing in net80211/_ieee80211.h,
resulting in issues which can be seen in the following build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=knemo

,---[ log excerpt ]---
| cd /build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod && /usr/bin/g++   -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod -I/build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/src/knemod -I/build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu -I/usr/include/KDE -I/usr/include/qt4/KDE -I/usr/include/qt4 -I/usr/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXmlPatterns -I/usr/include/qt4/QtWebKit -I/usr/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/include/qt4/QtAssistant -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/include/qt4/QtUiTools -I/usr/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/include/qt4/QtSvg -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt
 Sql -I/usr/include/qt4/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt3Support -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/default -I/build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/src/knemod/../common   -o CMakeFiles/knemo.dir/knemo_automoc.o -c /build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod/knemo_automoc.cpp
| In file included from /usr/include/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.h:34,
|                  from /build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod/../../../src/knemod/backends/bsdbackend.h:29,
|                  from /build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod/moc_bsdbackend.cpp:10,
|                  from /build/buildd-knemo_0.6.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-_bHHgB/knemo-0.6.1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/src/knemod/knemo_automoc.cpp:4:
| /usr/include/net80211/_ieee80211.h:135: error: 'uint32_t' does not name a type
| /usr/include/net80211/_ieee80211.h:136: error: 'uint16_t' does not name a type
| /usr/include/net80211/_ieee80211.h:137: error: 'uint8_t' does not name a type
| /usr/include/net80211/_ieee80211.h:141: error: 'uint8_t' does not name a type
`---

Mraw,
KiBi.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.49

The fix have been prepared in 0.48,
but this version have not been uploaded.

Please requeue knemo against current kfreebsd-kernel-headers.

Petr


kfreebsd-kernel-headers (0.48) unstable; urgency=low

  * Add #include <stdint.h> into <net80211/_ieee80211.h> (closes: bug#
    569628).

 -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:27:11 +0100

--- End Message ---
Reply to: