Hi folks, Bacula 5.0 is failing to build on both kfreebsd-i386 and amd64. It is building fine on all other Debian architectures. A couple of weird things here: 1) We're not getting an overt build failure, just the failure of a program to actually be built (or placed in the expected location) 2) Bacula 3.0.0 built fine on both of these platforms. Unsure if the present failure is due to a change in Bacula or in the platform. Can anyone assist? -- John
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#570890: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: dh_install fails on usr/sbin/bacula-fd
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:08:20 +0100
- Message-id: <20100222040820.25355.49948.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, 570890@bugs.debian.org
Source: bacula Version: 5.0.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*: | dh_install -pbacula-director-common | dh_install -pbacula-fd | cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp-install-sqlite3/usr/sbin/bacula-fd': No such file or directory | dh_install: cp -a ./debian/tmp-install-sqlite3/usr/sbin/bacula-fd debian/bacula-fd/usr/sbin/ returned exit code 1 | make: *** [install-stamp] Error 2 Full build logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=bacula I haven't had a chance to look into it yet, sorry about that. Mraw, KiBi.
--- End Message ---