[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#566773: marked as done (kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486: pf ignores any and all rules)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:45:13 +0100
with message-id <20100126214513.GA6597@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#566773: kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486: pf ignores any and all rules
has caused the Debian Bug report #566773,
regarding kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486: pf ignores any and all rules
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
566773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486
Version: 7.2-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

pf ignores any and all rules configured in /etc/pf.conf, even after being 
told to reload the ruleset with pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf.

I've tested this by blocking all traffic with the pf rule:
block all
and sshing in and out of the system, as well as running iperf.

I've tested this by explicitly blocking ssh traffic
block in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to any port 22
and sshing in

I've tested this by explicitly blocking iperf traffic (tcp port 5001 by default)
block out quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to any port 5001
and running iperf as a client on this system

The pf module is loaded, and I did in fact reload the rules with pfctl -f /etc/pf.con
prior to each test. I even did a pfctl -s rules and the running config aligned
with the rules I set each time.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 7.2-1-486
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486 depends on:
ii  freebsd-utils                 8.0-6      FreeBSD utilities needed for GNU/k
ii  kldutils                      8.0-6      tools for managing kFreeBSD module

kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486 recommends no packages.

kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:48:06PM -0500, William Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> > will@worrbase.com a écrit :
> >> Package: kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486
> >> Version: 7.2-11
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>
> >> pf ignores any and all rules configured in /etc/pf.conf, even after being
> >> told to reload the ruleset with pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf.
> >>
> >> I've tested this by blocking all traffic with the pf rule:
> >> block all
> >> and sshing in and out of the system, as well as running iperf.
> >>
> >> I've tested this by explicitly blocking ssh traffic
> >> block in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to any port 22
> >> and sshing in
> >>
> >> I've tested this by explicitly blocking iperf traffic (tcp port 5001 by default)
> >> block out quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to any port 5001
> >> and running iperf as a client on this system
> >>
> >> The pf module is loaded, and I did in fact reload the rules with pfctl -f /etc/pf.con
> >> prior to each test. I even did a pfctl -s rules and the running config aligned
> >> with the rules I set each time.
> >>
> >
> > This is not something I am able to reproduce here. Have you enable pf
> > with "pfctl -e"?
> >
> > --
> > Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
> > aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
> >
> 
> Looks like that was the issue. I'm sorry about the false bug report.
> 

Ok, closing the bug.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---
Reply to: