[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Parted

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:59:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it to
> > BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate?  I don't know if GNU/kFreeBSD
> > bugs are considered RC these days...).
> Does it really segfault on your machine? It shouldn't as it uses
> snprintf. In my case, the displayed name was just broken.
> If it doesn't segfault on your machine, I think it deserves a severity
> "minor".

Ok, I readjusted it.

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Reply to: