[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Back to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD



Hi everyone!

I had used Debian GNU/kFreeBSD some years back, but it didnt really work that 
good and I gave up on it. After having switched completey to FreeBSD as my 
Desktop/Notebook/Server-OS the last years I thought I would give it a chance 
again!

First impression: WOW! It works :D

No seriously I was really surprised by all the things working out-of-the-box. 
Now of course I had much more low-level FreeBSD-experience now so I new which 
kernel-moduls to load and all of that, but the system is quite useable beit 
not as polished as the Linux-Version of Debian of course.

But I'll not bore you with world view, here are the facts: ( I hope reporting 
these facts helps someone)

What works (my current setup):
- running kfreebsd-7-686-smp
- running xorg, with a lite kde-desktop (kdebase, konqueror, kmail, yakuake, 
kmplayer)
- networking, sound (although arts keeps crashing)

Issues I got resolved:
- had to disable Softupdates on root partition, because that currupted the fs 
on every shutdown (softupdates werent default for / so this isnt critical)

Open Issues (thanks fopr any help on these in advance):
- my usb-mouse isnt recognized. It works in FreeBSD7 but GNU/kFreeBSD only 
recognizes:
uhid0: <Logitech USB Gaming Mouse, class 0/0, rev 2.00/46.00, addr 2> on uhub2
uhid1: <Logitech USB Gaming Mouse, class 0/0, rev 2.00/46.00, addr 2> on uhub2

Did you remove any usb-related modules from the kernel? 

- dri doesnt work. Apperently libgl1-mesa-dri for kfreebsd doesnt contain 
i915_dri.so . Why? What could I do about it? 
As a side-project I'd like to compare 3D-Performance of FreeBSD, GNU/Linux and 
GNU/kFreeBSD to check some of the performance-myths floating around in the 
net.

- nfs actually works (great!), but only when manually calling mount_nfs. Doing 
mount -t nfs -a results in no mounts and just calling mount on a mount-point 
specified in fstab results in "unknown filesystem type"

- geli seems not to be available. Geli would be really great to have since its 
one of freebsd's superior features (at least IMHO). And it would give me the 
possibility to mount my other freebsd-partitions ;-) . The kernel-modul for 
geli works and is shipped, so I guess its only the userland part that isnt 
ported...


Concerning Packages:
Altogether really many(!) packages seem to work fine. I got most of what I 
usually need running and that is impressive ;) I even have stuff that I 
couldnt get working under native FreeBSD like GCJ/GIJ working as 
dropin-replacement for java (on the FreeBSD-side unfortunately not everyone 
is that free-software-enthusiastic so less time is spent on things like 
that).

Some packages of course dont work yet, so I'd like to know what the overall 
plan is concerning packages. Should I report broken packages? Is there a way 
to debug pkg-breakages? Do they occur randomly or is it mostly some 
well-known not-working pkgs that cause trouble, because a lot of other stuff 
depends on them? How can one help?


Also it would be great to know if there is some central spot for information. 
Things like a road-map, overview of which bsd-tools are kept, which ones are 
already or will be replaced my gnutools and why / why not. Also the default 
kernel-config (differences to GENERIC) used by Debian would be interesting.


....ok enough questions for the first email :)

Greetings
Hannes


Reply to: