Bug#442703: marked as done (posixtestsuite: FTBFS if build twice in a row)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:44:51 +0200
with message-id <8b2d7b4d0804190844k95be84dv4cabf488b57d2258@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: posixtestsuite: FTBFS if build twice in a row
has caused the Debian Bug report #442703,
regarding posixtestsuite: FTBFS if build twice in a row
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
442703: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: posixtestsuite: FTBFS if build twice in a row
- From: Patrick Winnertz <winnie@der-winnie.de>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:11:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20070916181154.GA32551@h1190993.stratoserver.net>
Package: posixtestsuite
Severity: important
Version: 1.5.1-1
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:
#### END OF BUILD NO 1 ####
############
#### RUNNING BUILD NO 2 ####
############
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is posixtestsuite
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.5.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386
dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 1.5.1-1
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
patches: debian/patches/00_find_warnings.patch debian/patches/01_gnu.patch debian/patches/02_expect.diff
Trying patch debian/patches/02_expect.diff at level 0...success.
Trying patch debian/patches/01_gnu.patch at level 0...success.
Trying patch debian/patches/00_find_warnings.patch at level 0...success.
if [ "reverse-patches" = "debian/stamp-patched" ]; then touch debian/stamp-patched; fi
rm -f debian/stamp-patch*
rm -f debian/patches/*.log
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/posixtestsuite-1.5.1'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/posixtestsuite-1.5.1'
dh_clean
dpkg-source -b posixtestsuite-1.5.1
dpkg-source: building posixtestsuite using existing posixtestsuite_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building posixtestsuite in posixtestsuite_1.5.1-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to mess.cat: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: building posixtestsuite in posixtestsuite_1.5.1-1.dsc
dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
******************************************************************************
Build finished at 20070905-1823
#### END OF BUILD NO 2 ####
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
The full build-log can be found at: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2/
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.
Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a explanation
for this mass bug filling.
[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 442703-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: posixtestsuite: FTBFS if build twice in a row
- From: "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:44:51 +0200
- Message-id: <8b2d7b4d0804190844k95be84dv4cabf488b57d2258@mail.gmail.com>
Version: 1.5.2-1
It seems that with this release, this bug has been fixed, thus closing
the report. Reopen it if I'm wrong.
Regards,
Sandro
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
Reply to: