Petr Salinger a écrit :
Now, when logs from SVN are elsewhere, I second Aurelien's "switch everything to debian-bsd" (http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00114.html).Then we supress glibc-bsd-devel ?Yes, hibernate glibc-bsd-devel.Or maybe we want to keep it for development issues? (and let debian-bsd be for user questions and general stuff)For now discuss on debian-bsd both user and development issues. I guess it will not bother users to know what's going on with their port.
Agreed. This is already true for other ports, maybe not for amd64, but for other lists I am subscribed like -sparc, -mips or -hppa where there is as much development questions as users questions.
Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net