[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#334228: marked as done (renders network unusable)



Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
with message-id <E1ERFBA-0002Rg-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#334228: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 12:34:12 +0000
>From rmh@aybabtu.com Sun Oct 16 05:34:12 2005
Return-path: <rmh@aybabtu.com>
Received: from 216.red-62-57-140.user.auna.net (khazad.dyndns.org) [62.57.140.216] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ER7iN-0008B8-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:34:12 -0700
Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ER7iK-00056O-P8; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:34:08 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: renders network unusable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:34:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1ER7iK-00056O-P8@khazad.dyndns.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: critical

There's a critical usability problem with version 5.4-2.  See:

  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-October/000563.html

I have verified that 5.4-1 is not affected.  Since the differences between these
versions are minimal:

   * Enabled 586 and 686 CPUs support on the 486 flavour and 686 CPUs
     support on the 586 flavour (closes: bug#332836).
   * Use --march to optimize flavours (closes: bug#332897).

It's almost 1:1 sure caused by -march flag (sorry, my fault :(()

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334228-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:39:19 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Sun Oct 16 13:39:19 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ERFBA-0002Rg-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
To: 334228-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334228: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.4-3
Message-Id: <E1ERFBA-0002Rg-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
Delivered-To: 334228-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kfreebsd-5
Source-Version: 5.4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kfreebsd-5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.diff.gz
kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.dsc
kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 334228@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> (supplier of updated kfreebsd-5 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:21:56 +0200
Source: kfreebsd-5
Binary: kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-headers-5-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-586 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-486 kfreebsd-headers-5-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-5-586 kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-486 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-486 kfreebsd-image-5-586 kfreebsd-headers-5-486 kfreebsd-source-5.4 kfreebsd-image-5-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1 kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-586
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Description: 
 kfreebsd-source-5.4 - source code for kernel of FreeBSD 5.4 with Debian patches
Closes: 334228
Changes: 
 kfreebsd-5 (5.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Use -mtune instead of -march (closes: bug#334228).
Files: 
 381d06540ef462215630b56495baeae5 1327 devel optional kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.dsc
 246f9c9125b50d4b7fcb266aad58df89 34248 devel optional kfreebsd-5_5.4-3.diff.gz
 bce50f5b8dd253fbe08153c2fbf8c5ba 13153790 devel optional kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUqR+w3ao2vG823MRAmV+AJ0TOg4hF5ID0z33LdfXkXh5/BmJ7QCeKb6v
ln7o+V6H8U88II2vwj9DUIQ=
=NuT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: