Re: Glibc and NetBSD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes:
> perhaps initially netbsd libc - it seems to me to be much more likely
> to work 100% (or close to) with the kernel. after a lot of testing
> you might want glibc for default (but i'd always hope otherwise :)
What about the -current libc, where the kernel uses some sort of
signal trampoline? Will glibc have that?
My question is, why are you wanting to use glibc at all? What does it
do that the stock NetBSD libc doesn't do, other than have GNU all over
it?
- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys
iD8DBQE9PeV7l6Nz7kJWYWYRAg4GAJ9ipNfJMIMb7h+acrGkldcbFyKkzQCfUV/z
h7C7oD4iwVxWPLu9ZW9Bbxs=
=JM2/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: