re: Glibc and NetBSD

To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: re: Glibc and NetBSD
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:52:23 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 19396.1027435943@eterna.com.au>
In-reply-to: your message of "Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:49:22 +0100." <[🔎] 20020723134922.GA13704@srcf.ucam.org>

   I have a sufficiently working glibc that I can build binutils and gcc
   against it and then use them to rebuild a working glibc, but it'll need
   some work yet before it's even vaguely production ready. The general
   opinion at Debconf seemed to be that going with glibc was preferable to
   using BSD libc - does anyone have any comments?


can't we have both?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glibc and NetBSD
  - From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>

References:
- Glibc and NetBSD
  - From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>

Prev by Date: Glibc and NetBSD
Next by Date: Re: Glibc and NetBSD
Previous by thread: Glibc and NetBSD
Next by thread: Re: Glibc and NetBSD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread