Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> (2025-10-30):
> [chattr lsattr]
>
> > The regular ones are interestingly provided by e2fsprogs, which has an
> > e2fsprogs twin where those could probably be added. Any reasons to
↑
e2fsprogs-udeb is what I meant to write
> > prefer the busybox implementation over e2fsprogs's or the other way
> > around?
>
> To me there's not much point to provide an extra udeb while busybox's
> ones are sufficient, and while most other tools in D-I are built on top
> of busybox.
Just to clarify: It was not about adding an extra udeb but about adding
two more executables into an existing one.
> Actually I'm surprised I haven't enabled them in busybox udeb long
> time ago - I think I already come across this same problem before.
> But I don't use D-I much, so that's most likely why.
>
> Enabling the two in udeb config...
If you're happy to take the lead on this and to enable those two
applets, that's fine with me, thanks!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature