Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> (2025-10-19): > Looks fine to me, but d-i ack needed for the udeb. Full diff enclosed. No objections, Samuel's been dealing with those things so would know much more. The untrained eye might find dz(azerty-deadkeys) [templates] vs. dz(azerty-oss) [changelog] a little surprising though. > On another note, does the duplicate CHANGES file add anything? If this > is a native package anyway, surely debian/changelog is all that's > needed? I'm not exactly sure who else might be using this package so I've never challenged the existence of the CHANGES or COPYRIGHT symlinks, but yeah, that's a little annoying to see the same diff twice when reviewing… CHANGES seems to have gone away and back, but not too many details in d2176ed34f02bbe398eaa3d30dec0605e71ab0a4. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature