Hello everyone! Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: > Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> (2024-12-20): >> Assuming that there are no conflicts, my understanding is that moving >> is reasonably safe since d-i has been merged. On the flip side, I also >> do not see urgency in doing the move. > > The “no urgency” was my bottom line as well. > > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00121.html if you > haven't seen it already.) > >> Now let me turn your question back: Should I exempt udebs in lintian? > > If you don't mind adding a check/exemption now, and reverting it “later” > (either in a few days/weeks or after trixie is published, we wouldn't > touch that during the freeze) once we agree we want to start doing the > work (possibly modifying most if not all udebs at the same time), that > would be perfect I think: people wouldn't have to worry about this when > they touch udeb-producing packages (which I suppose is what just > happened to Jonathan when he prepared rootskel-gtk). > Is anyone else also still seeing this lintian error? What's the plan for the next three months? If we do a coordinated udeb usrmerge, when will it happen? Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature