[rt.debian.org #9807] Upgrade dillon to bookworm
- To: "OtherRecipients of rt.debian.org Ticket #9807":;
- Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, kibi@debian.org
- Subject: [rt.debian.org #9807] Upgrade dillon to bookworm
- From: "Adam D. Barratt via RT" <rt@rt.debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 18:17:16 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] rt-4.4.6+dfsg-1.1+deb12u2-1397651-1755800235-1190.9807-7-0@debian.org>
- Reply-to: rt@rt.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <rt-4.4.6+dfsg-1.1+deb12u2-507959-1752606419-1444.9807-7-0@debian.org>
- References: <RT-Ticket-9807@debian.org> <rt-4.4.6+dfsg-1.1+deb12u2-507959-1752590873-1987.9807-7-0@debian.org> <rt-4.4.6+dfsg-1.1+deb12u2-507959-1752591092-108.9807-7-0@debian.org> <20250715190654.ceybojmcqc3y5eun@mraw.org> <rt-4.4.6+dfsg-1.1+deb12u2-507959-1752606419-1444.9807-7-0@debian.org>
Hi,
On Tue Jul 15 19:06:59 2025, kibi@debian.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam D. Barratt via RT <rt@rt.debian.org> (2025-07-15):
> > I'd like to look at upgrading dillon to bookworm.
> >
> > The d-i.debian.org metapackage looks like it should be fine as-is on
> > bookworm.
> >
> > Do you see any issues with the upgrade from a d-i perspective? Are
> > there any particularly good times to do the upgrade, or that you'd
> > prefer to avoid?
>
> If you folks are on a roll and want to get this over with, I'd hate to
> be in your way. That being said, it's much easier for me to rely on
> dillon-built pages to prepare d-i releases, and I'd like to get one or
> two out before 13.0… so if we could avoid touching dillon before that,
> that would have my slight preference.
The release happened now - yay!
Are there any current issues from the d-i perspective? Any times that you'd prefer we avoid? (Or indeed that would be preferred for the upgrade).
Thanks,
Adam
Reply to: