Hello Cyril, list, On 25/05/2025 18:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Roland Clobus <rclobus@rclobus.nl> (2025-05-25):Looking at the WWW for this issue: Is a call to `depmod` missing?Oh, right. The other modules I'm including in this way are used way later, and the lack of depmod hasn't been spotted until now (the first module udeb that gets installed papers over that lack). I'll give it another shot.
Thanks.
However, I'm a bit surprised by having kernel 6.12.29 in the test image.That's with a local d-i build, built against sid (I've been chasing quite a number of bugs lately).
Understood. The kernel version should not matter for this specific use case.
So in summary:
...
* I didn't test the espeakup yet, but assume it will workWould you be willing to give espeakup a try with an updated image, with that extra depmod? I could also switch to building against trixie if that makes any difference for your testing, but if that's not stricitly required, I'd love not to toggle back and forth between trixie and sid (it's easy to leave extra packages — deb and/or udeb — on the side of the road while doing so).
Use either sid or trixe. I'll look at the image if you write it is ready. With kind regards, Roland
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature