Hi, To be honest, I almost asked what the plans were for 6.12.29-1 regarding this issue, and whether Severity: important was appropriate. But I got busy with other things and let this fly… Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-05-25): > I see your point and having though the ITS mitigations in my opinion > is more important. But stepping a bit back I fully understand as well > your point of view. > > Cyril and Debian boot people, would you actually want to not get > 6.12.29-1 into trixie? Regarding the installer itself, I'm fine with either having .29 then .30 or just waiting for .30. I definitely can see how live people might want to avoid a known broken kernel's reaching testing though. > FWIW, the next upload *will* include a fix for the loop issue. I have > already imported 6.12.30 for the packaging and marked the loop fix as > to be backported to 6.12. Great news! Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature