Hi Holger, Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> writes: > Hi, > > Am 18. Mai 2025 09:31:17 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>: >>On 18/05/2025 at 00:23, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >>> If it needs to have support added, is implementing this for trixie a >>> hard NACK? >> >>I am not the one who can answer to this. > > IMO this sounds rather experimental, and such work should happen during development cycle and not in freeze period. > What is the subject of "IMO this sounds rather experimental"? Are you referring to the following? >> Will creating a `partman-btrfs/debian/partman-btrfs.templates` just work >> or does partman-basicfilesystems need work to have support added? > > As I wrote above with a caveat, btrfs-specific mount option descriptions > could be defined in partman-btrfs templates. Thus I've submitted an MR that does things in the KISS way using partman-basicfilesystems. I'm also ok with this work going into a point release when users of older hardware report regressions such as increased power usage due to continuous TRIM (Fedora is still working on this). I've added one user-requested feature (compress=lzo), and the remainder of my work is pretty much annotated warnings for mount options that users cargo-cult from reddit and various HOWTOs. I would also be happy to write more involved release notes if necessary. Or are you referring to translator work? If most translators are burned out and don't see the value of my proposed changes at this time then I'll understand and accept this. P.S. I can try a French translation if it would help! :) Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature