[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rescue_1.101_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable



Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes:

> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> (2025-05-04):
>>  rescue (1.101) unstable; urgency=medium
>>  .
>>    * Team upload.
>>    * Do source-only upload (Closes: #1104685).
>
> Since the following files don't appear in the git repository, and aren't
> documented, I'd assume they got included by error, and they shouldn't be
> in the source package (they weren't in either 1.99 or 1.100):
>  - 0001-Add-support-for-split-usr.patch (includes a 2021 indication);
>  - A-PLAN;
>  - TODO.

Oups.  That's embarrassing!  I forgot that manually building a
source-only package means that files that aren't checked into git aren't
excluded.  Sorry.  Thank you for catching it.

> I'd be fine with closing my eyes and migrating 1.101 as it is, but
> that'd just generate the cleanup differences in debdiffs later on.
>
> I'd be also fine with uploading a cleaned up 1.102 if you confirm my
> assumption above. (Don't worry about resetting the counter, I can urgent
> things into testing.)
>
> The second option would have my slight preference, and is trivial/quick
> to do on my side.

Give me a moment to double-check when we started using subvolumes, I'll
let you know, and then you can fix-up that possibly buggy changelog
entry in 1.100.

Cheers,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: