[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rescue_1.100_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable



Hi Pascal and Nicholas,

Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> (2025-04-22):
>    [ Pascal Hambourg and Nicholas D Steeves ]
>    * Add preliminary support for rescuing Debian installed to a btrfs
>      subvolume (Closes: #1018894, #1103476).  Supported rescue cases are:
>      1. The default installation to @rootfs (bookworm and later)
>      2. The default installation to subvolid=5 (buster or earlier).
>         "subvolid=5" was chosen over "subvol=/" for maximum disambiguation.

Sorry for the stupid question, but this seems to leave a hole, as
bullseye (11) can be found between buster (10) and bookworm (12). Is
that correct, or is there a typo somewhere?

(I don't really have the time/energy to dive back into the bug logs, or
to try and figure out on my own what's actually supported. I also do
realize the “preliminary” word appears in the changelog entry.)

This isn't really time-critical, and I don't need a detailed answer
(e.g. “bullseye is unsupported for now” or “woops, s/buster/bullseye/”
or “woops, s/bookworm/bullseye/” would be more than enough); I'd just
like to make sure I can write an accurate release announcement in the
next few days.

Thanks already!


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: