Re: Bug#1094501: moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 07:52:28PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:38:02 -0500 "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > tags 1094501 moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > I see the removal request for http-request but webmock looks like it's
> > sticking around. Mind taking a look into these?
> >
> > Checking reverse dependencies...
> > # Broken Depends:
> > ruby-em-http-request: ruby-em-http-request
> >
> > # Broken Build-Depends:
> > ruby-em-http-request: ruby-em-socksify
> > ruby-webmock: ruby-em-socksify
> This is also part of the current key package set.
My partial analysis shows this is part of the key package set due to
d-i:
meta:manual => debian-installer
debian-installer build-depends dns323-firmware-tools
dns323-firmware-tools depends ruby-ffi
ruby-ffi build-depends ruby-rspec
ruby-rspec build-depends ruby-childprocess
ruby-childprocess build-depends ruby-coveralls
ruby-coveralls build-depends ruby-vcr
ruby-vcr build-depends ruby-em-http-request
ruby-em-http-request build-depends ruby-em-socksify
ISTM d-i could stop build-depending dns323-firmware-tools. There
are no armel kernels anymore (except -rpi). Keeping a firmware
support package for armel hardware that cannot be installed onto
anymore seems unnecessary to me.
Maybe there are other reasons that will keep ruby-em-socksify in the
key package set, but this chain could be cut off?
Adding CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org so they could hopefully
chime in.
BR,
Chris
Reply to: