Re: Make d-i packages usrmerge-ready?
Hi,
Am 20. Dezember 2024 02:23:37 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
>Important topics:
> - does the package build?
> - does it get accepted when it reaches the archive?
> - is the runtime within d-i OK?
>
>If you get a triple yes, the rest doesn't matter.
That was the easy part, and I got Yes for all three (for the
two it tried - anna + grub-installer).
>> Should we change this, or is the lintian error a false-positive?
>
>At this point, I don't know, and I don't want to know. This move has
>been a HUGE mess for MANY years. And if we don't run into troubles as it
>is, then I don't see a need to change anything.
For the lintian part there is a follow-up in another thread.
But I just would like to point out:
since the d-i initrd.gz is already usr-merged, it seems inconsistent
to me, if we leave the d-i packages completely unchanged.
Just my 2 cent
>If you want to include more l10n changes at this point that's still
>fine, but delaying other code changes would have my preference at this
>point. I'll have to check a few more things before mailing the usual
>reminder to dda@ about freezing udeb-producing packages temporarily,
>check with the images team, and wade through the website and other
>places to prepare for Trixie Alpha 1.
Feel free to upload packages for an alpha, or not. As you wish.
For a first alpha the translation status is sufficient IMO.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Reply to: