Re: Bug#1077845: release.debian.org: Should non-free-firmware require being built on buildd?

[Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>]

Roland Clobus:
> On 03/08/2024 18:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Had a quick look at the testing `Sources` file for non-free-firmware. 
> > We are 10/15 on `Autobuild: yes` with remaining 5 not having the header.
> ...
> > The 5 that are not `Autobuild: yes` would be:
> >
> > atmel-firmware
> > bluez-firmware

I was informed on IRC about 
https://salsa.debian.org/bluetooth-team/bluez-firmware/-/merge_requests/4, 
so I presume bluez-firmware might disappear


> > dahdi-firmware
> > live-tasks-non-free-firmware
>
> This is a 'meta' package, that only refers to other firmware packages, 
> it does not contain firmware itself.

Thanks Roland. That sounds like it trivially could be converted to an 
`Autobuild: yes` package.

> > midisport-firmware
> >
> > (as far as my wetware was able to eyeball)
>
> With kind regards,
> Roland Clobus

That leaves us with 3/15 and the question whether we want to commit for 
future firmware.

Best regards,
Niels