[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1070121: nmu: coreutils_9.4-3 (trixie), pam_1.5.2-9.1 (trixie)



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: coreutils@packages.debian.org, pam@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:coreutils src:pam

coreutils_9.4-3.1 and pam_1.5.3-7 aren't currently migrating to trixie
for whatever reason. Because debootstrap doesn't currently know about
versioned Provides, I think it would be useful to get versions of these
packages in trixie that have been rebuilt against the 64-bit time_t ABIs
and package names.

If the versions in trixie don't migrate imminently, please consider:

nmu coreutils_9.4-3 . ANY . trixie . -m "rebuild against libssl3t64"
nmu pam_1.5.2-9.1 . ANY . trixie . -m "rebuild against libdb5.3t64"

In a trixie derivative (a non-public future branch of the Steam Runtime)
I found that local rebuilds of those two source packages were enough to
bring a minbase debootstrap back from repeatably failing to reasonably
reliable. I hope they would have a similar effect in real trixie.

Based on kibi's thread "Making trixie debootstrap-able again?" on -release
and -boot, binNMUing util-linux and iproute2 might also help for d-i's
use-case, which is larger than minbase and wants fdisk and iproute2:

nmu util-linux_2.39.3-6 . ANY . trixie . -m "rebuild against libreadline8t64"
nmu iproute2_6.7.0-2 . ANY . trixie . -m "rebuild against libtirpc3t64"

but I have not independently verified that those two are necessary
or sufficient.

    smcv


Reply to: